Originally posted by: Stoneymontana
We hardly interfer in anything like this

Originally posted by: Andural69

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Andural69
California can ban the brown substance in there for cola, but banning the sale of the size of a drink that can be sold is fucking retarded. It's not the governments job to protect us from our own stupidity.

someone has to when they can't manage themselves

Natural Selection is supposed to take care of that.

Unfortunately it doesn't happen fast enough

Not our problem. If 7-11 wants to sell me and I want to buy a 64oz Slurpee, that shouldn't be a problem. As long as the people aren't picking up the healthcare costs of my ass. And I sure as fuck shouldn't be stopped because of the fat fucks running around all the time drinking them all while downing a deep-fried Twinkie every hour.

The correct response to people getting fat is dealing with the healthcare system. And I'm OK with letting people die who can't afford the healthcare system because I certainly don't want to pay into socialist money grab-bag and have it pay out to people who can't control their food intake or choose not to exercise. We are responsible for ourselves. The government shouldn't be banning this. this means we're a step away from having chips or even salt banned, because retards don't have self-control. Let them learn that the government won't be paying their medical bills and hospitals will be denying them service if they can't pay and they'll take a much healthier stance...or retards will die off and make the world a better place. And to be clear, I'm not knocking fat people. you want to be fat, enjoy, just don't ask me to chip in on your medical bills. So with that, 7-11 should be able to sell a combo of 64oz drinks with a burrito and a side of deep-fried macaroni if they want to. It's up to me to have decide to indulge or not.

God this bill is fucking stupid and so are most people.

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.


This is about Peak Oil, and the government's insidious way to try to reduce consumption of plastics, which are derived from petroleum.

How much oil is wasted on those giant plastic 32oz. drink cups and plastic bottles? How much energy is expended creating paper cups that also hold those quantities?

Wake up, stupid people! This is about the fact that Peak Oil happened 20 years ago, and the government is just trying to prolong the illusion that we have no problems.

Originally posted by: Andural69

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Andural69
California can ban the brown substance in there for cola, but banning the sale of the size of a drink that can be sold is fucking retarded. It's not the governments job to protect us from our own stupidity.

someone has to when they can't manage themselves

Natural Selection is supposed to take care of that.

Unfortunately it doesn't happen fast enough

Not our problem. If 7-11 wants to sell me and I want to buy a 64oz Slurpee, that shouldn't be a problem. As long as the people aren't picking up the healthcare costs of my ass. And I sure as fuck shouldn't be stopped because of the fat fucks running around all the time drinking them all while downing a deep-fried Twinkie every hour.

The correct response to people getting fat is dealing with the healthcare system. And I'm OK with letting people die who can't afford the healthcare system because I certainly don't want to pay into socialist money grab-bag and have it pay out to people who can't control their food intake or choose not to exercise. We are responsible for ourselves. The government shouldn't be banning this. this means we're a step away from having chips or even salt banned, because retards don't have self-control. Let them learn that the government won't be paying their medical bills and hospitals will be denying them service if they can't pay and they'll take a much healthier stance...or retards will die off and make the world a better place. And to be clear, I'm not knocking fat people. you want to be fat, enjoy, just don't ask me to chip in on your medical bills. So with that, 7-11 should be able to sell a combo of 64oz drinks with a burrito and a side of deep-fried macaroni if they want to. It's up to me to have decide to indulge or not.

God this bill is fucking stupid and so are most people.

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Andural69

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Andural69
California can ban the brown substance in there for cola, but banning the sale of the size of a drink that can be sold is fucking retarded. It's not the governments job to protect us from our own stupidity.

someone has to when they can't manage themselves

Natural Selection is supposed to take care of that.

Unfortunately it doesn't happen fast enough

Not our problem. If 7-11 wants to sell me and I want to buy a 64oz Slurpee, that shouldn't be a problem. As long as the people aren't picking up the healthcare costs of my ass. And I sure as fuck shouldn't be stopped because of the fat fucks running around all the time drinking them all while downing a deep-fried Twinkie every hour.

The correct response to people getting fat is dealing with the healthcare system. And I'm OK with letting people die who can't afford the healthcare system because I certainly don't want to pay into socialist money grab-bag and have it pay out to people who can't control their food intake or choose not to exercise. We are responsible for ourselves. The government shouldn't be banning this. this means we're a step away from having chips or even salt banned, because retards don't have self-control. Let them learn that the government won't be paying their medical bills and hospitals will be denying them service if they can't pay and they'll take a much healthier stance...or retards will die off and make the world a better place. And to be clear, I'm not knocking fat people. you want to be fat, enjoy, just don't ask me to chip in on your medical bills. So with that, 7-11 should be able to sell a combo of 64oz drinks with a burrito and a side of deep-fried macaroni if they want to. It's up to me to have decide to indulge or not.

God this bill is fucking stupid and so are most people.

What's stupid is you think that you don't help pay for these peoples hospital bills when they are sick & need help.
They will & they do get treated. & if they can't pay for it, guess who does. The ER can't refuse people from treatment. Who do you think pays for all those bills when they don't get paid?
You're already paying to help treat people who can't afford to go to the doctor.
Are you really that blind?

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Andural69

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: Andural69
California can ban the brown substance in there for cola, but banning the sale of the size of a drink that can be sold is fucking retarded. It's not the governments job to protect us from our own stupidity.

someone has to when they can't manage themselves

Natural Selection is supposed to take care of that.

Unfortunately it doesn't happen fast enough

Not our problem. If 7-11 wants to sell me and I want to buy a 64oz Slurpee, that shouldn't be a problem. As long as the people aren't picking up the healthcare costs of my ass. And I sure as fuck shouldn't be stopped because of the fat fucks running around all the time drinking them all while downing a deep-fried Twinkie every hour.

The correct response to people getting fat is dealing with the healthcare system. And I'm OK with letting people die who can't afford the healthcare system because I certainly don't want to pay into socialist money grab-bag and have it pay out to people who can't control their food intake or choose not to exercise. We are responsible for ourselves. The government shouldn't be banning this. this means we're a step away from having chips or even salt banned, because retards don't have self-control. Let them learn that the government won't be paying their medical bills and hospitals will be denying them service if they can't pay and they'll take a much healthier stance...or retards will die off and make the world a better place. And to be clear, I'm not knocking fat people. you want to be fat, enjoy, just don't ask me to chip in on your medical bills. So with that, 7-11 should be able to sell a combo of 64oz drinks with a burrito and a side of deep-fried macaroni if they want to. It's up to me to have decide to indulge or not.

God this bill is fucking stupid and so are most people.

What's stupid is you think that you don't help pay for these peoples hospital bills when they are sick & need help.
They will & they do get treated. & if they can't pay for it, guess who does. The ER can't refuse people from treatment. Who do you think pays for all those bills when they don't get paid?
You're already paying to help treat people who can't afford to go to the doctor.
Are you really that blind?

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana
Absolutely! Hell, ban it period, nationwide.

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.


This is about Peak Oil, and the government's insidious way to try to reduce consumption of plastics, which are derived from petroleum.

How much oil is wasted on those giant plastic 32oz. drink cups and plastic bottles? How much energy is expended creating paper cups that also hold those quantities?

Wake up, stupid people! This is about the fact that Peak Oil happened 20 years ago, and the government is just trying to prolong the illusion that we have no problems.

Originally posted by: [-NM-] -SS-

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana
Absolutely! Hell, ban it period, nationwide.

Have you lost your mind?

For someone who allegedly has a conservative ideology, I cant believe you would use gvt to strip away an individual liberty.

Are you one of those people who say "cut down the size of gvt, but not my Social Security"?

Originally posted by: [-NM-] -SS-

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana
Absolutely! Hell, ban it period, nationwide.

Have you lost your mind?

For someone who allegedly has a conservative ideology, I cant believe you would use gvt to strip away an individual liberty.

Are you one of those people who say "cut down the size of gvt, but not my Social Security"?

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana

Originally posted by: [-NM-] -SS-

Originally posted by: Stoneymontana
Absolutely! Hell, ban it period, nationwide.

Have you lost your mind?

For someone who allegedly has a conservative ideology, I cant believe you would use gvt to strip away an individual liberty.

Are you one of those people who say "cut down the size of gvt, but not my Social Security"?

Sorry that the majority of this country can't walk & talk at the same time, let alone know how to take care of themselves properly. If they can't & it's rather obvious they can't, then someone needs to.

Originally posted by: Bigguns 93

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.


This is about Peak Oil, and the government's insidious way to try to reduce consumption of plastics, which are derived from petroleum.

How much oil is wasted on those giant plastic 32oz. drink cups and plastic bottles? How much energy is expended creating paper cups that also hold those quantities?

Wake up, stupid people! This is about the fact that Peak Oil happened 20 years ago, and the government is just trying to prolong the illusion that we have no problems.

Half right which makes you ALL WRONG!!!

If you can't get 32 ounces of soda you have to buy 2 x 16 ounce bottles. That's more plastic - two caps, twice the packaging, twice the manufacturing.

Because Peak Oil will drive up the prices and create more government control they are forcing you to consume petroleum faster so that Peak Oil has even greater effect ( bigger than $4 a gallon for gas ... uh oh), and then they can come in and start rationing, price fixing, taxing.

Simply repeating an issue, and one that will happen (fossil fuel is a fixed supply and there is unlimited demand), is not enough. When you want to try and be funny and make it sound like a kooky conspiracy you have to add logical consequences that would come about in an illogical way. You can also have illogical consequences that come about in an illogical way.

Originally posted by: Coba|t

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.

Can you list one major brand of soda you can buy anywhere in the country that has sugar instead of corn syrup as an ingredient?

Even exported mexican coke uses corn syrup now. Its cheap thanks to years of subsidies.

Originally posted by: Allen

Originally posted by: Coba|t

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.

Can you list one major brand of soda you can buy anywhere in the country that has sugar instead of corn syrup as an ingredient?

Even exported mexican coke uses corn syrup now. Its cheap thanks to years of subsidies.

Jones Soda. Not sure if you'd consider it a "major" brand though.

While Coke swears there is no difference in taste between Coke made with High Fructose Corn Syrup and Coke made with cane sugar, Pepsi continues to give credence to the opposite side of that argument. The beverage company has announced that plans to sell its sugar-sweetened Pepsi Throwback and Mountain Dew Throwback sodas as long as people buy them.

"We've put it back in the market and we'll see where it goes," the PepsiCo CFO told reporters last week about Pepsi Throwback.

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
Yeah... Pepsi has it's "Throwback" line of soft drinks.

http://consumerist.com/2010/10/pepsi-throwback-is-here-to-stay-for-now.html

While Coke swears there is no difference in taste between Coke made with High Fructose Corn Syrup and Coke made with cane sugar, Pepsi continues to give credence to the opposite side of that argument. The beverage company has announced that plans to sell its sugar-sweetened Pepsi Throwback and Mountain Dew Throwback sodas as long as people buy them.

"We've put it back in the market and we'll see where it goes," the PepsiCo CFO told reporters last week about Pepsi Throwback.

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
Nanny-State.

Originally posted by: Kal-

Originally posted by: Allen

Originally posted by: Coba|t

Originally posted by: Bibimbap
You know... this really isn't about obesity and the fallacy that sugar is a tremendous health hazard.

Can you list one major brand of soda you can buy anywhere in the country that has sugar instead of corn syrup as an ingredient?

Even exported mexican coke uses corn syrup now. Its cheap thanks to years of subsidies.

Jones Soda. Not sure if you'd consider it a "major" brand though.

Is Pepsi 'major' enough for you Cobalt?